| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 21:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why can't one change the past and correct their mistakes? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 21:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kiroma Halandri wrote:How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if wood chucks could chuck would? Why do you have to be such an ass all of the time? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 21:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tsadkiel wrote:if by thaumic you mean thaumaturgic, then who cares?! you have MAGIC!! So THAT is where the word 'magic' comes from. Drop the 'thau' and the 'tur'...
Tsadkiel wrote:but seriously though, no one's curious? ; ; i needs the practice!
I am curious, but I really wish I could go back in time and fix all of my mistakes on these forums. Unfortunately, I can't. I can only move in three of the many dimensions that make up this universe. I have absolutely no idea how those Hypercube Factories do it.
But yeah, I think we need some more serious posters. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 22:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tsadkiel wrote:dimensions are always fun to talk about :3 extra spacial dimensions add some really interesting consequences to the world.
consider this.
imagine you are holding a rectangular block (like a lego brick or something). the brick has three spacial dimensions: Length, Width, and Depth. if we shine a light over the brick we get a shadow, which is a two dimensional projection of our three dimensional brick. if we change the orientation of the brick with respect to the light, the area of the shadow changes, but it is still just a projection of the SAME OBJECT.
now, suppose we have an object that has many MANY spacial dimensions and we try to observe it. what we will see is a three dimensional projection of that object. if we were to move around that object, its volume may change, but it is still just a projection of the SAME OBJECT.
what does this mean? the TARDIS may not be mathematically impossible, and if we ever get the ability to build objects in multiple spacial dimensions, then we can make things that are bigger on the inside than they are on the outside.
NEAT! I know all of that already. That is how the Cargo Containers in EVE work.
But thanks for attempting to enlighten me. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 23:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Gamma Ray Bursts?!
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE! This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 00:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Did you know that my bedroom is now irradiated with Alpha Particles?
It all happened when my Smoke Detector broke.
You see, Smoke Detectors work by shooting Alpha Particles around inside themselves (they contain Americium 241), and that allows the air within them to conduct electricity. Thus, when Smoke enters the Smoke Detector, it blocks the Alpha Particles, thus breaking the circuit, thus causing the alarm to go off.
My smoke detector went off for no reason what so ever a few months ago, and now it is hanging from the cieling by its cable. And thus, there are now enough Alpha Particles in my room to conduct the Static Electricity between two halves of a bandaid package, but nowhere near enough to kill me.
But I do hope that it isn't enough to give me cancer either. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 00:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
If the Universe is going to end, then why are we sitting here worrying about it? There isn't anything we can do about it anyway. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Total Annihilation. Pandorum Invictus
62
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 00:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
You should make a wish.
Also, you look like a Vulcan, OP. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
67
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 22:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tsadkiel wrote:Valei Khurelem wrote:Can you fire projectiles in space without oxygen? I.e. an artillery cannon or sniper rifle, standard conventional weapons? this depends entirely on the nature of the shell. the firing mechanism in most guns is entirely mechanical, while the reloading mechanism is usually done by harnessing the back pressure created from the combustion of the round. it's not unlikely though that a spaceship would have a reloading mechanism similar to that of, say, a battleship, where the rounds are reloaded through completely mechanical processes. this means that the only issue we need to tackle is the combustible component of the round itself. if the round was designed SPECIFICALLY to fire in a vacuum it's completely feasible that the charge was designed to combust with some other, more energetic gas, and that the charge and gas are sealed behind the bullet against the vacuum. an even better idea would probably be to just use gas pressurized charges. screw gun powder, we're in space! we can shoot bullets with compressed air! the net force applied to the bullet will be dependent on the difference in pressure between the charge and the environment. since we are in a vacuum we can get this difference to be VERY large :3 maybe minmatar guns are just giant airsoft pistols lol Actually, you can fire a gun in space wish Gun Powder alone. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
67
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 22:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
Blade N'Mare wrote:Amazing thread!
Here's a question for you.
Eve ships all seem to be jet powered (not sure what they run off, as they dont need refulling). Remembering that I am a plumber by trade and not any sort of science guru, I would assume that the ships move in accordance with one of Newtons laws "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction". Now, in a car in real life, the wind resistance and rolling resistance rises at a greater rate then your speed increase, which means every vehicle will have a top speed. But a space ship has no wind or rolling resistance so theoretically, to my little mind at least, should be able to accelerate for as long as its fuel last.
Is this right, and if so, can some one please explain why my ruppy tops out at 370m/s? The Warp Reactor creates a field that simulates Wind Resistance. Turning it off would cause the ship to explode due to a Critical Existance Failure. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 06:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
The answer to the ultimate question is actually its own question: Why Not? THAT is what we should try to figure out the answer to, not "Why". This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 23:39:00 -
[12] - Quote
People have made 4D games (like 4D snake, which is like snake except in a Hypercube and you move along 4 axis of movement).
Do you think it would be more effecient for the Tranquility server to simply move objects really fast when in warp, or to actually move them in the 4th Dimension? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
70
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 22:53:00 -
[13] - Quote
Remember to answer my question about wether it would be more CPU Effecient for CCP to have the ships simply go extremely fast when warping or to just make the game world 4- or 5-dimensional. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
73
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 03:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tsadkiel wrote:Amaroq Dricaldari wrote: Remember to answer my question about wether it would be more CPU Effecient for CCP to have the ships simply go extremely fast when warping or to just make the game world 4- or 5-dimensional.
if CCP wanted to we could just teleport from point A to B, no dimensions required... it's a computer simulation. we can make it do whatever we want. Yeah, but you can be stopped mid-warp by Interdiction Bubbles, so it isn't as easy as just teleporting the ship and making it look like you're actually moving. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
73
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 03:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nevermind. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
73
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 06:27:00 -
[16] - Quote
No, no, no, no, no. Go sign up for the airforce, asked to be assigned to that mountain complex, take the elevator, and go as low as you could possibly go. There, you can use your knowledge of astrophysics for something greater than great.
Nah, I'm just kidding. This isn't Stargate. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
73
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 02:48:00 -
[17] - Quote
Are the Replicators from Stargate scientifically possible to build with any level of technology? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
80
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 06:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Can you please give us a short answer to that Astronaut Question? You gave me a headache, and I still don't know the answer.
Also, I saw you say "Prime Directive" in an earlier post. You have been watching too much Star Trek. Speaking of ST, when do you think we will develop the technology for subspace communication? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
80
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 00:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
The problem with Theoretical Physics is that I don't see any practical applications for it in everyday life. What applications could Theoretical Physics have in the near future that would turn it into an "Applied Science"? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
81
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 03:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Unscheduled Offworld Activation
Do you think it actually would be possible to create a stable artificial wormhole like they do in Stargate? And do you think the atmosphere would leak through? Also, can you please give me a possible explanation as to why you can't see what is on the other side? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
81
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 06:27:00 -
[21] - Quote
I think Dark Matter is some kind of impossible compound consisting of Matter and Anti-Matter, and the only reason it doesn't cancel itself out is because of pure energy keeping the atoms and anti-atoms together. It wouldn't absorb, reflect, or emit any form of radiation, and it wouldn't create sound or anti-sound.
Darkness isn't the opposite of light. It is the absence of light. It is Anti-Light that is the opposite of light, sort of like how Anti-Matter is the opposite of matter.
Silence isn't the opposite of sound, but the absence of it. Like with Anti-Light being the opposite of light, Anti-Sound is the opposite of sound. The two would cancel eachother out.
Matter absorbs and reflects Light, and Anti-Matter absorbs and reflects Anti-Light. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
86
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 12:09:00 -
[22] - Quote
What would happen if there was an X-Files episode about Moulder and Scully finding a TV with X-Files playing on it? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
91
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 00:01:00 -
[23] - Quote
I have a VERY complex theory about the universe. I actually based it on TRON, to be honest. The Universe is an ultra-powerful Quantum Computer, combining Digital and Analogue, Electromechanical and Chemical, Spintronics, all of that good stuff. And the theory of universe expansion can best be described as multiple computers beign mass-manufactuered and connecting to a giant network, not unlike our internet.
Wormholes and Subspace and all of that stuff would be the circuit boards and wires and the internet and the like, where as normal space would be the Chemical-Computer part, and matter would just be data traveling through it. You know how suppossedly get5s destroyed in Black Holes? That's easy, the data is getting trapped in something similiar to a Windows Recycle Bin, and thus getting Deleted. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 01:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
What is it with you and Blackholes?
I want you to name and describe every part of a Blackhole, and to do so in order of center-to-edge. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
92
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 19:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
If you are tearing the fabric of the universe, then you would destroy the universe. Haven't you seen any episode of StarGate Atlantis where they try to create Zero Point Energy? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
103
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 05:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
Dark Matter is a Quantum Supoer Position between Matter and Anti-Matter. End of Dark-Matter related discussions. This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |

Amaroq Dricaldari
Malicious Mission Murderers
105
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 11:16:00 -
[27] - Quote
Schrodinger's Cat. Need we say more? This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |
| |
|